God versus Particle Physics: A No Score Draw

God versus Particle Physics: A No Score Draw

John Davies


The booklet provides the conclusions of a psychologist trying to make experience of up to date particle physics as defined in a few well known technological know-how texts and media articles, written via physicists, looking to clarify the workings of the sub-atomic global.

The money owed, it really is argued, are a) collectively unique and contradictory, and b) metaphysical or magical in essence. issues of the publication comprise: a dialogue of ways we enable physicists to invent issues that experience no perceivable characteristics, since they have to be there simply because another way their preconceptions are improper or their sums don t paintings; that, from a mental point of view, modern idea in particle physics has a similar homes as the other act of religion, and a similar barriers as trust in God; and that physics has now reached some extent at which more and more physicists study their very own mental buildings instead of whatever that's unambiguously there or real.

It encourages humans to invite simple questions of the kind we regularly use to question the life of God; akin to the place is he/it?, express me?, Do it then, while did it happen?, How have you learnt it exists?, and so forth, and means that humans take a leaf out of Dawkins textual content, The God Delusion, yet use it on high-end physics up to to non secular dogma: turning water into wine is an insignificant conjuring trick in comparison to generating a complete universe out of nothing."

Show sample text content

Download sample