The Dionysian Mystical Theology (Mapping the Tradition)
The Dionysian Mystical Theology introduces the Pseudo-Dionysian "mystical theology," with glimpses at key levels in its interpretation and significant reception in the course of the centuries. partially one, the elusive Areopagite's personal miniature essay, The Mystical Theology, is quoted in its entirety, sentence via sentence, with observation. Its cryptic contents will be nearly impenetrable with out sensible connection with the remainder of the Dionysian corpus: The Divine Names, The Celestial Hierarchy, The Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, and the 10 Letters. Of certain value is the Dionysian use of negations in an "apophatic" theology that acknowledges the transcendence of God past human phrases and concepts.
Stages within the reception and critique of this Greek corpus and topic are sketched partially : first, the preliminary sixth-century creation and marginal reviews (Scholia) through John of Scythopolis; moment, the early Latin translation and statement by way of the ninth-century Carolingian Eriugena and the twelfth-century remark via the Parisian Hugh of St. Victor; and 3rd, the serious response and competition by means of Martin Luther within the Reformation. In end, the Dionysian apophatic is gifted along other kinds of adverse theology in gentle of contemporary and postmodern pursuits within the subject.
no longer John, says that the writer the following must reassure his readers that the negations but to return don't suggest that God doesn't even exist. PG four 428D. 17. MT four 1040D, 148.2–8, 141. 18. MT four 1040D, 148.8. 19. MT four 1040D, 148.4f–5, 141. forty five THE DIONYSIAN MYSTICAL THEOLOGY decay. Being the reason for all this, and above all of it, God is well-known as being past such issues insofar as we deny or negate them as falling in need of the transcendent. In that manner, we ascend past feel belief towards.
Orthodox Christology, and ordinary of John to pile dogmatic weight upon a narrow textual content. Our recognition for the instant needs to stay on John and his doctrinal matters. during this scholion, John doesn't emphasize christological doctrine or heresies, yet simply reviews that the Dionysian be aware complete capability “the Lord, having assumed soul and body.” on its own, the word merely tricks at an anti-Apollinarian Christology, even though the Prologue made specific point out of a “rational soul.” yet there are numerous different.
short incredible afterlife yet quite as an identifiable Greek manuscript destined for translation and a longevity of exposition and appropriation.1 After the preliminary reception of the manuscript, the 2 key participants to the early Latin Dionysian culture have been John the Scot (Eriugena) within the 9th century and Hugh of St. Victor within the 12th century, either one of whom wrote commentaries at the Celestial Hierarchy. This bankruptcy sketches how they interpreted the Areopagite, emphasizing key passages.
Theology the entire method to the move, as with Bonaventure: “Therefore Dionysius, who wrote approximately ‘negative theology’ and ‘affirmative theology,’ merits to be ridiculed. [In the latter a part of his paintings] he defines ‘affirmative theology’ as ‘God is being.’ ‘Negative theology’ he defines as ‘God is nonbeing.’ yet, if we want to supply a real definition of ‘negative theology,’ we must always say that it's the holy pass and the afflictions [attending it].”53 right here, in fact, we're either repeating fabric.
ReThinking Dionysius the Areopagite, edited via Sarah Coakley and Charles M. Stang, 85–102. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 2009. initially released in smooth Theology 24, no. four (2008). 147 THE DIONYSIAN MYSTICAL THEOLOGY Cousins, Ewert. Bonaventure and the accident of Opposites. Chicago: Franciscan bring in, 1978. Curiello, Giocchino. “Pseudo-Dionysius and Damascius: An very unlikely Identification.” Dionysius 31 (2013): 101-116. Daniélou, Jean. Platonisme et théologie mystique: essai sur los angeles.