Thinking Clearly: Cases in Journalistic Decision-Making
Written by way of top specialist newshounds and classroom-tested at colleges of journalism, considering essentially is designed to impress dialog concerning the concerns that form the construction and presentation of the inside track within the twenty-first century. those case reviews depict real-life moments whilst humans operating within the information needed to make serious judgements. pertaining to questions of craft, ethics, festival, and trade, they conceal a variety of topics--the advertisement imperatives of newsroom tradition, criteria of verification, the contest of private and non-private pursuits, together with the query of privacy--in numerous key episodes: Watergate, the Richard Jewell case, John McCain's 2000 presidential crusade, and the Columbine taking pictures, between others.
assembly of senior editors early that night, the tale used to be mentioned at size. John Cranfill, handling director of the dallasnews.com site, recollects expressing doubts in regards to the story’s accuracy. “I used to be skeptical of the tale. It raised sit back bumps on my hands. I lobbied to attend at the tale. however the others felt we had it reliable, and the choice used to be made to run it within the first edition.”4 the tale was once then despatched out to the linked Press and Knight Ridder wires and published at the paper’s net.
major indicates after which discusses them later on and posts her matters. “This totally made a difference,” she acknowledged later. “Your newsroom has to grasp the place the moral line and the delicate line are sooner than whatever like this occurs otherwise you will have negative problems.” 68 Alicia C. Shepard At 2:38 P.M. KMGH’s helicopter zooms in at the university library with riveting stay video of a scholar. “Look, you'll discover a bloody scholar within the window,” gasps anchor Lynn. The digicam catches an armored.
Bonner within the The bloodbath in El Mozote 113 Mexico urban workplace of the hot York instances. The message by no means reached Bonner. Radio Venceremos, the voice of the rebels, which had close down through the govt offensive, resumed broadcasting in past due December and issued its first bloodbath account—a hugely emotional one—on Christmas Eve. Salvadoran President José Napoléon Duarte, in a countrywide broadcast per week later, denounced the bloodbath tale as “a guerrilla trick.”1 regardless of those public.
26, after the conference had adjourned. A Slush Fund published within the few minutes he used to be in Miami, Hughes controlled to trace down Hugh Sloan, the one-time Nixon finance committee treasurer. It used to be at the moment, Woodward and Bernstein say, that Sloan published to Hughes that the Dahlberg money and the Mexican funds have been part of a bigger money fund stored in safes at CRP headquarters—one in Sloan’s previous place of work and one in Stans’s place of work. This was once the key crusade fund—the slush fund—that the P.R.
touch upon the put up record, a spokesman for President Nixon’s reelection committee, Powell Moore, stated, “I imagine your assets are undesirable; they’re delivering incorrect information. We’re not likely to remark past that.” requested if the committee used to be for this reason denying the contents of the tale, Moore replied: “We’re simply unlikely to comment.” Later, Moore issued a proper assertion that learn: “There is admittedly no fact to the fees within the put up tale. Neither Mr. Mitchell nor Mr. Stans has any wisdom.