Menu
Home
News
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Television - Tech, General, and Q&A
DTV | HDTV Reception and Antenna Discussion
EV's Best Top Rated FM and HD Radio Antenna Guide & Reviews
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Piggie, post: 21688, member: 2941"]Amps, overload and noise floors have been known for almost a century since the first tube receivers were built. So it's very old knowledge. </p><p></p><p>It's all about "wireless" being rediscovered. Typical for everything in life and history of something being "rediscovered". There are always those during the rediscovery process that ignore old data simply calling it old and saying this is today and past knowledge is irrelevant since it's now the future.</p><p></p><p>I simply call it not knowing or learning from history. </p><p></p><p>I can tell from things posted here from time to time, regardless of how many times I say that an amp DOES NOT boost the signal making the antenna perform better, someone eludes back to the fact amp increases gain. Hog wash! </p><p></p><p>It's a mindset of being bombarded by incorrect information, and misunderstanding. Granted the difference between antenna gain and preamp gain and what it accomplishes seems elusive. Then add noise figure into that and it seems to loose even more. </p><p></p><p>I hear it all the time that an amp has to help because the reception is better. Sure, since most modern amps have a lower noise figure than the receiver itself.</p><p></p><p>I guess I need to get off my pork loins and write the article I keep putting off.</p><p></p><p>A 300 ohm twin lead antenna for VHF put up high on a wall behind the TV can out perform rabbit ears and easily hidden behind a picture if needed. I submit also it's better to put the balun as close as possible to the twin lead folded dipole as possible[/QUOTE]</p><p></p>
[QUOTE="Piggie, post: 21688, member: 2941"]Amps, overload and noise floors have been known for almost a century since the first tube receivers were built. So it's very old knowledge. It's all about "wireless" being rediscovered. Typical for everything in life and history of something being "rediscovered". There are always those during the rediscovery process that ignore old data simply calling it old and saying this is today and past knowledge is irrelevant since it's now the future. I simply call it not knowing or learning from history. I can tell from things posted here from time to time, regardless of how many times I say that an amp DOES NOT boost the signal making the antenna perform better, someone eludes back to the fact amp increases gain. Hog wash! It's a mindset of being bombarded by incorrect information, and misunderstanding. Granted the difference between antenna gain and preamp gain and what it accomplishes seems elusive. Then add noise figure into that and it seems to loose even more. I hear it all the time that an amp has to help because the reception is better. Sure, since most modern amps have a lower noise figure than the receiver itself. I guess I need to get off my pork loins and write the article I keep putting off. A 300 ohm twin lead antenna for VHF put up high on a wall behind the TV can out perform rabbit ears and easily hidden behind a picture if needed. I submit also it's better to put the balun as close as possible to the twin lead folded dipole as possible[/QUOTE]
Preview
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Television - Tech, General, and Q&A
DTV | HDTV Reception and Antenna Discussion
EV's Best Top Rated FM and HD Radio Antenna Guide & Reviews
Top