Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE=&quot;tballister, post: 45392, member: 5087&quot;]YA!&nbsp; THAT is EXACTLY (to me) the promise, and I enthusiastically second the sentiment.Its the promise of being able to help stimulate market (re)acceptance of OTA.&nbsp; E.g., the promise of being able to get past the wife's question &quot;You want to put THAT on the roof!?!?&quot; (sorry, Hun).&nbsp; The promise of being able to transition from requiring a bunch of gaudy aluminum (uh, not in my eyes, the wife's) to requiring something not much more obtrusive than a satellite dish.Its great.Keep an eye on AntennasDirect.&nbsp; I'm under the impression they are working on a significant re-work of the DB8.&nbsp; The target is quite clear; its the CM4228HD's game to lose.&nbsp; Sometimes it better to not be the first on the market...&nbsp;&nbsp; Its a good point; I'll integrate it into my pondering of N-Bay physics' compatibility with VHF...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="tballister, post: 45392, member: 5087"]YA! THAT is EXACTLY (to me) the promise, and I enthusiastically second the sentiment. Its the promise of being able to help stimulate market (re)acceptance of OTA. E.g., the promise of being able to get past the wife's question "You want to put THAT on the roof!?!?" (sorry, Hun). The promise of being able to transition from requiring a bunch of gaudy aluminum (uh, not in my eyes, the wife's) to requiring something not much more obtrusive than a satellite dish. Its great. Keep an eye on AntennasDirect. I'm under the impression they are working on a significant re-work of the DB8. The target is quite clear; its the CM4228HD's game to lose. Sometimes it better to not be the first on the market... Its a good point; I'll integrate it into my pondering of N-Bay physics' compatibility with VHF...[/QUOTE]

Name

Verification