Menu
Home
News
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Television - Tech, General, and Q&A
DTV | HDTV Reception and Antenna Discussion
Information from Broadcast Industry Insiders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Don_M, post: 48762, member: 3184"]O.T.: Best way to push back against nosy bureaucrats would be to provide the head count required under Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, <em>and nothing else</em>. The penalty for failure to respond is a $100 fine. There's not much risk: Prosecution under <a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/13/221.html">13 USC 221</a> would cost many multiples of the maximum fine.</p><p></p><p>But yeah, I'd make an exception for such a question, too <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" />[/QUOTE]</p><p></p>
[QUOTE="Don_M, post: 48762, member: 3184"]O.T.: Best way to push back against nosy bureaucrats would be to provide the head count required under Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, [I]and nothing else[/I]. The penalty for failure to respond is a $100 fine. There's not much risk: Prosecution under [URL="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/13/221.html"]13 USC 221[/URL] would cost many multiples of the maximum fine. But yeah, I'd make an exception for such a question, too :D[/QUOTE]
Preview
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Television - Tech, General, and Q&A
DTV | HDTV Reception and Antenna Discussion
Information from Broadcast Industry Insiders
Top