Menu
Home
News
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
Forums
Advanced Discussion
Antenna R&D
SuperShaped Antennas!?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Reply to thread
Message
<p>[QUOTE="Rickideemus, post: 123417, member: 12677"]The plainly named "Antenna Company" is adding the third dimension to those fractal antennas you've been reading about. They have the superformula, and apparently a superpatent, on Supershaped Dielectric Resonator Antennas which add from 3 to 6 dB of gain to a typical WiFi network.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p1.pdf">http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p1.pdf</a></p><p><a href="http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p2.pdf">http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p2.pdf</a></p><p><a href="http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p3.pdf">http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p3.pdf</a></p><p><a href="http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p4.pdf">http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p4.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>The 45% bandwidth mentioned in the docs should be wide enough for the UHF band. WiFi antennas do not typically have reflectors, so I suspect there's little motivation to simulate that dimension for OTA broadcast antennas. But even if you could add 3 to 6 dB to a reflectorless omni antenna, it could be a game changer. They had to write their own simulators. Conventional antenna software may not be able to simulate complex 3 dimensional elements.</p><p></p><p>The preferred material for supershaped elements is not metal; it's dielectric resonating plastic or ceramics. By a stunning coincidence, Antennas Direct's patent for the DBxe line was published recently, and what do you suppose those cute little orange connectors are made of? Why dielectric resonating plastic of course!</p><p></p><p><a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/8674897">United States Patent: 8674897</a></p><p></p><p>The patent title is "Antenna assemblies including antenna elements with dielectric for forming closed bow tie shapes," and the only difference I see between the patented design and a conventional bowtie is the dielectric end connectors.</p><p></p><p>Rick[/QUOTE]</p><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rickideemus, post: 123417, member: 12677"]The plainly named "Antenna Company" is adding the third dimension to those fractal antennas you've been reading about. They have the superformula, and apparently a superpatent, on Supershaped Dielectric Resonator Antennas which add from 3 to 6 dB of gain to a typical WiFi network. [url]http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p1.pdf[/url] [url]http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p2.pdf[/url] [url]http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p3.pdf[/url] [url]http://www.antennacompany.com/docs/p4.pdf[/url] The 45% bandwidth mentioned in the docs should be wide enough for the UHF band. WiFi antennas do not typically have reflectors, so I suspect there's little motivation to simulate that dimension for OTA broadcast antennas. But even if you could add 3 to 6 dB to a reflectorless omni antenna, it could be a game changer. They had to write their own simulators. Conventional antenna software may not be able to simulate complex 3 dimensional elements. The preferred material for supershaped elements is not metal; it's dielectric resonating plastic or ceramics. By a stunning coincidence, Antennas Direct's patent for the DBxe line was published recently, and what do you suppose those cute little orange connectors are made of? Why dielectric resonating plastic of course! [url=http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/8674897]United States Patent: 8674897[/url] The patent title is "Antenna assemblies including antenna elements with dielectric for forming closed bow tie shapes," and the only difference I see between the patented design and a conventional bowtie is the dielectric end connectors. Rick[/QUOTE]
Preview
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Advanced Discussion
Antenna R&D
SuperShaped Antennas!?
Top